• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Teaching in Higher Ed

  • Podcast
  • Blog
  • SPEAKING
  • Media
  • Recommendations
  • About
  • Contact

Determining Who We Are in Digital Spaces

By Bonni Stachowiak | January 2, 2017 | | XFacebookLinkedInEmail

personal branding

The Question

I received this question from one of my doctoral students:

I really have no idea how to create a “brand” or how to create my blog to reflect who I am.  Do you have any suggestions on how to figure out who I am, in the land of technology?”

Her question was so powerful that I wanted to share my thoughts to a broader community and invite others to provide suggestions to her, as well. In my reply to her, I'll consider:

  • What is a personal brand and is that the “right way” to talk about our online presence?
  • How do our blogs and other social media help to reflect who we are?
  • How do we figure out who we are, when we're online?

My Response

Let me start by saying how glad I am that you're asking these questions. Part of what has gone wrong with social media in certain contexts is that others haven't pondered in this way, before engaging online. Those of us who are more present online rarely stop asking these questions. Recent examples of these kinds of reflections include:

  • My friend and his husband just adopted a beautiful baby girl. They are reflecting on how much they want to share about her online and in what context.
  • A friend from college just announced that after the worst year of her life, that she and her husband were now separated, as of New Year's eve. She shared that she usually prefers to keep all her posts on Facebook positive, but she knew people would want to be aware of this change in her life.
  • Many educators pondered how to return to the classroom, after the results of the Presidential election had been announced.

Personal Branding

The first time I remember having someone attempt to convince me that I was needed the same thing that my breakfast cereal did, was in a keynote talk given by Tom Peters in the early 90s. Cheerios needed help being identified and valued in the minds of consumers. And I needed help being identified and valued in the minds of current and future employers.

Tom Peters asserted:

Starting today you are a brand.

You're every bit as much a brand as Nike, Coke, Pepsi, or the Body Shop. To start thinking like your own favorite brand manager, ask yourself the same question the brand managers at Nike, Coke, Pepsi, or the Body Shop ask themselves: What is it that my product or service does that makes it different? Give yourself the traditional 15-words-or-less contest challenge. Take the time to write down your answer. And then take the time to read it. Several times.”

I was intrigued, but also wasn't sure that I wanted to be some big corporate brand. Peters also wrote about more of us being freelancers, and at that time, that idea scared the heck out of me. The idea of an A-Z guide for my personal brand seemed too inauthentic for whatever it was I might attempt to do online. Yet, I didn't want to leave the results of what happened whenever someone inevitably Googled me in the hands of others.

Blogging and Social Media as Reflections of “Us”

Finding a voice online is difficult in the same way that figuring out who we are and who we are becoming when we're in-person is hard. We can certainly opt to hide all sorts of things about ourselves when we're online, but we can do that when we're face-to-face, as well. Greg McKeown warns us that thinking of ourselves as a multitude of skills is dangerous and that rather, we should consider our one main distinctive that we want others to perceive about us.

For me, that answer took a long time to come by, but I'm a teacher. That's what I do. That's what I'm good at. That's what I think about, constantly. When I blog or participate in social media, my primary focus is going to be on teaching. These days, I often get to be a teacher of other teachers, which brings me great joy.

In one of my doctoral classes, our professor recommended that we think about who our “stick figure is…” That is, who is it that you serve? Who is your audience of one? Rather than thinking about a broad, target market, he proposed that we find one person who we can always consider ourselves “talking to” when we blog, or give voice to our thoughts in other ways.

Adding Value Online

Once we have started thinking about the primary way we might be able to serve others and who one of the people we provide value for might be, we then can think about how to express some of that online. It can be intimidating to do this for a whole host of reasons, including that it's hard to be authentic, because it requires such vulnerability.

  • What if I don't have anything to offer?
  • What if I'm wrong about something?
  • What if I wind up changing my mind about something, but now my old thoughts are still out there?
  • What if I wind up being bullied or trolled online, the way so many others have in the past?

One way to get started is to think less about creating original content and instead provide value by seeking out others' content, making sense of it, and then sharing it.

Become a Curator

The most extreme example of being an expert curator is Dave Pell. He makes his whole living reading the news and then synthesizing it for those of us who don't have time to read 75 news sites a day. While I suspect you won't have time to go to that kind of extreme, as you consider your primary distinctive, hopefully you're regularly consuming news, resources, and other information in that area.

Here's a less-extreme examples of curation around a personal brand. Mike Taylor is an expert in the training and development field who I've been following for years now. Mike's LinkedIn profile is reflective of someone who has done the work to articulate and refine the way others come to know him. In his own words, he is:

Exploring the intersection of learning, technology & social media”

As 2016 ended, Mike created a series of curated posts, all around the theme of 12×12. 12 posts that each contained 12 items. Here were a few that caught my eye:

  • My favorite learning quotes
  • Day 3 – books
  • 12 super useful job aids and cheatsheets

Next Steps

None of what I've described above is easy. This journey is best taken in small steps and with the realization that you'll never be done. I wish you the best as you start down the path and hope others will share their advice with you, as well.

Filed Under: Personal knowledge mastery

Fall 2016 Experiments and Evaluations

By Bonni Stachowiak | December 27, 2016 | | XFacebookLinkedInEmail

Our university switched over to online course evaluations this semester.

The good news is that the system they decided to use integrates with our learning management system (Canvas). They were able to set up reminders for students to complete the evaluations that were irritating enough to get them to complete them. All seemed to go smoothly on the students' end of things, in terms of collecting the desired data.

I received a 93% response rate on the evaluations, making them essentially comparable to when we were doing paper evaluations in past semesters.

What I consider to be the bad news is that we weren't informed about how we would be evaluated on our teaching, prior to the evaluations being distributed to our students in our LMS.

When we moved off of our old system, we were no longer allowed to use our provider's proprietary set of course evaluation questions. New questions were developed by our institution, but word never went out as to what questions our students would be asked about their learning experience.

My 2016 Fall Experiments

I've taught introduction to business for 12 years now. However, it seems like every semester is at least somewhat different. This semester, I experimented in two ways:

  1. Incorporated a bit of public sphere pedagogy (though the stories shared by Thia Wolf on the podcast still have me realizing I've only just scratched the surface)
  2. Tested more often and lowered the stakes on exams (inspired in part by James Lang‘s book, Small Teaching)

Public Sphere Pedagogy

This semester, I decided to take inspiration from Shark Tank and have business professionals come in as judges for the student's business plan presentations. The judge's role was to indicate how much confidence they would have in investing in the various business ideas that were shared.

Inviting people who haven't yet established relationships with the students was a very important part of the process. It seemed to cause the students to take their presentations more seriously than they might otherwise have… What the guests said carried more weight, since there was no way that having already known them would have impacted their perceptions of this final part of the course.

I can't recommend highly enough, incorporating some type of public sphere pedagogy into your course design. Doug McKee recently shared about the success of his poster sessions event for his applied econometrics class at Cornel. If nothing else, as he shares, your students will probably have a bit more fun.

Thia was so right when she said:

When [students] go public with their work, they have to stand by it, and really remarkable things happen.” – Thia Wolf

Testing Frequency and Stakes

Previously, when I taught introduction to business, there have been three exams. In total, the exams were worth 45% of the students' grades. Doing poorly on any one exam could potentially bring a student's grade down in the class an entire letter grade.

This semester, I decided to increase the frequency of exams and also add the ability for students to drop their lowest exam grade. The nice part about this process is that our learning management system (Canvas) has a feature built in that meant that throughout the semester, students could see that their lowest exam score was being dropped and they were even able to enter in what-if scenarios for what the mathematical results would be, if they attained certain scores on upcoming exams.

I added an exam in a format I've started calling the “not-so-final final exam.” Students are provided an overview of all the topics in the class, in the form of pencasts (video lectures with me drawing and them hearing my voice), quizzes, and assigned reading.

Those students who earned over 90% on the not-so-final final exam were allowed to skip taking the final exam and use that score as their final exam grade. As you might imagine, this was hugely motivational for some of the top students. 10% of the students were able to attain this grade and skip the final.

After the not-so-final final, students had three, regular exams, and one comprehensive final exam. When the judges for the business plan presentations were determining who the business(es) were that they were going to fictitiously invest in, I spoke to the students about their experiences with the revised exam format for this semester.

100% of the students indicated in our dialogue that they would prefer to take more exams, with the ability to have their lowest exam score graded. I was extremely pleased with this part of my semester's experiments and plan on incorporating this methodology in all future courses that involve exams.

2016 Fall Course Evaluations

Reading my course evaluations was quite edifying this semester. I received high scores on the questions that asked whether or not I explained the course requirements, was prepared to teach each class session, and that I used class time effectively.

I'm not going to go too much into particulars, but there was clearly a single student who was unhappy with the class and me as a professor. Whenever this happens, I work hard to remember that there were 29 others who had very positive things to report. Also, I attempt not to predict who it might have been who responded in that way. Nonetheless, I'm human, and sometimes I get discouraged, or I try to unravel the mystery of who it was…

I had someone recommend that I keep an encouragement folder with notes, emails, and letters from students to revisit, when I need a little boost. This time, it wasn't necessary for me to pull the encouragement folder out, but I mention it to you, in case you want to start depositing items like this into a folder, for the times when you'll be in need of affirmation.

It was nice to see that 100% of the students found that I was responsive to questions, was available for help outside of class, and that I graded assignments in a timely manner.

One of the evaluation questions that I typically skip to, when I first start reviewing them is the one regarding the difficulty of the course. As Betsy Barry shared on episode #089 of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast:

It turns out that the harder your course is, the higher your evaluations will be…” – Betsy Barry

As I look at the students feedback about the difficulty of this course, I'm trying hard not to try to figure out who the two students might be who found the course somewhat easy. I was pleased that the majority of the students found it challenging, though.

I got to know the students who earned A grades fairly well in this class and all of them reported that it was difficult for them. I met with them often during the semester, as they worked to achieve good results on upcoming exams and assignments. Their hard work paid off… So, perhaps there were a couple of students who weren't aiming for an A, but thought that if they had put more effort in, they would have been able to “easily” achieve a higher grade.

Here I go, trying to figure out who responded in what way, when I'm not sure that's particularly helpful. Sigh. This is the quantitative feedback about the perceived difficulty level.

Edifying Feedback

As I finish this post, here are some comments I'll be saving in my encouragement file, for those times when I need to “get back up, again.”

How would you describe the effectiveness of the teaching activities for this particular course:

Holy cow, Dr. B could pack so much fun into such a short 50 minutes class. I learned so much about business, life and my faith through her expressive, personal, and hilarious personality. I loved every minute of this class, and as a non-major, graduating senior, I am beyond thankful that I took this class. I loved it.”

Every teaching activity inside and outside of class has really challenged me as a student and helped me learn in a way in which I never have before. My business professor, Dr. Stachowiak, is the best teacher I have ever had in my life, and I'm excited to take the skills I've learned in this course with me in life!”

This class changed my life. This was my first business class and yes it was a lot more work than my other classes, but I learned the most in this class. There are many things I can say that have helped me this semester. Outside of class she assigned us required reading and we had to take online quizzes for those chapters. A lot of work because it required you to read a few chapters then take a couple test all on the same time, but it forced me to read and be prepared for upcoming class. So the knowledge that I read, her teaching and discussions in class added to the knowledge I already knew. It was so helpful throughout the semester. I never felt like I was drowning with so much informations, she knew exactly what she as doing and how to prepare us for the best.”

Do you have any feedback and/or suggestions that might make this class more effective in the future?

I wish that every vanguard student could take this as a general education class. It is so helpful to know just some of the basics of business no matter where you end up in your career you will have a boss or be a boss and this gives you such a great taste of what business is all about. Dr. B is an incredible human and I am beyond thankful for the amount of time she took to know everyones name, speak into our individual gifts and abilities, and teach our class with care, concern and absolute joy that radiate from everything she does.”

Dr. Stachowiak has an amazing personality and made going to class enjoyable. Her teaching was very effective the way it is.”

Negative Feedback

As I indicated earlier, there was clearly one student who was unhappy with the course, in general, and with me, as the professor. I received some negative, qualitative feedback, along with the positive comments.

She should right down the notes instead of posting them online and expect us to know it all and what it means.”

NEED TO TAKE NOTES IN CLASS NOT ONLINE AND LEARN THEM ON YOUR OWN!”

I usually like to take any negative feedback that's been provided and think through some action steps I could perform to make the learning experience better for future students. However, in this case, it was difficult to know what this student meant by ‘notes,' since I don't really have ‘notes,' per se, that I post online, or provide in class.

The best I can take away from these comments is that perhaps this student felt a disconnect between what was happening in the classroom and what was done online (this class is in a blended format). I am constantly working to have communication channels that connect our in-class experiences with the online ones. That is likely something that I'll never feel like I have 100% right, but I'll never stop trying.

Also, I'm reminded of how Stephen Brookfield has shared how difficult it can be to teach. While this set of evaluations leave me feeling like we had a successful Fall of 2016, I never want to have even one person feel like they weren't provided with the help that they needed.

And so, we keep on working to facilitate learning more effectively for our students… And try to keep a sense of humor.

Filed Under: Teaching

Top 10 DownloadedTeaching in Higher Ed Podcast Episodes

By Bonni Stachowiak | December 21, 2016 | | XFacebookLinkedInEmail

Top Ten Episodes

Those of us who podcast are regularly told to not get too hung up on our metrics. I started 2016 with a goal to grow the Teaching in Higher Ed community by 50% by October. Once I hit that goal, I stopped going back to review the results quite as often. However, I still know that I am sometimes overly focused on quantity of downloads, over quality of the connections we have been able to build through this community.

Still, it is nice to see more people are listening to podcast episodes each week. Well, to be clear, I don't actually know who listens. I'm only able to tell how many people download each of the shows.

List-making is quite popular this time of year. There's Oprah's Favorite Things of 2016, Wired's 2016 Wish List, Slate P!cks, and both The Sweet Home and The Wire Cutter gift guides.

I've decided to participate in the trend by making a list of the most downloaded episodes of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast. I know that each week, new listeners continue to join the community and may have missed some good shows along the way.

Top 10 Teaching in Higher Ed Podcast Episodes

This list of the ten most downloaded episodes of the Teaching in Higher Ed podcast is not in any particular order. It's been interesting to see how the most popular episodes have fluctuated during the course of the year. I get so curious when a particular geographic region downloads a significant amount of a particular episode, but have yet to unravel any of those mysteries.

Episode #092 – Small Teaching with James Lang

This was Jim's second visit to the podcast. Our first conversation (on episode #019) was about his book, Cheating Lessons. In the most recent episode (#092), Jim shared about the small changes we can make in our teaching that will provide the biggest leverage toward improved learning.

While I have treasured each opportunity I've had to interview Jim for the podcast, he has also contributed to the community in other ways. He regularly recommends guests (including some that you'll get to hear in early 2017). He also has written the most edifying words that anyone has ever shared about the podcast in Improving My Teaching Via Podcast in The Chronicle of Higher Education.

Episode #096 – The Clinical Coach with Dr. Jeffrey Wiese

While listening to an episode of the Teach Better Podcast, I heard Geoff Connors (from the Yale School of Medicine) speak about his mentor, Jeff Wiese. I found Dr. Wiese's teaching portfolio and was instantly captivated. Jeff agreed to come on the show for episode #096 and ever since airing, it has remained popular.

Episode #107 – Engaging Learners with Gardner Campbell

The connection I feel when talking with Gardner is hard to describe. As he described standing with his students listening to Peter Gabriel's Solsbury Hill, I instantly traveled to a place I have never been, yet somehow felt like home. He reminded us that “great ideas of all kinds come from all kinds of people at all stages of their knowledge.”

Somehow, he can mention authors who I have never heard of before, yet not leave me feeling closed off from the learning. He challenges us to regularly gauge how our students are experiencing their learning.

Episode #089 – The Research on Course Evaluations with Betsy Barry

Our institution switched over to online evaluations this semester. A few times, I found myself wanting to stop the process and ask those leading the effort to first listen to this conversation with Betsy. She provides an overview of six surprising insights about course evaluations, all in a clear, concise, and engaging way.

Episode #087 – What the Best Digital Teachers Do with Sean Michael Morris

Sean has been on the podcast twice now. Each time, he has challenged me to release some of my desire to quantify learning, and to recognize it for the complex process that it is… He reminds us to regularly revisit our courses, as he asserts: “Every time we step into a classroom or design a new course … we have to step back and realize we don’t know anything, that each time it is new.”

After we spoke, Sean sent me such a thoughtful gift. It was an autographed copy of Savvy, a wonderful book that transported me to a wonderful place and taught me about agency and teaching.

Episode #110 – Self-regulated Learning and the Flipped Classroom with Robert Talbert

Getting to know Robert through two podcast interviews and the Teaching in Higher Ed Slack Channel has been rewarding. I have a feeling that after a few more months, Robert's most recent interview on the Getting Things Done methodology will continue to garner multitudes of downloads.

On episode #110, Robert shares about self-regulated learning and the flipped classroom. He states: “You can’t say that you are interested in teaching students how to learn and then spoon-feed them everything.” Robert has already agreed to come back in 2017 to share about his new book on the flipped classroom.

Episode #114 – Engage the Heart and Mind Through the Connected Classroom with Ken Bauer

Like Robert, Ken Bauer has engaged through both being interviewed on the show, but also on the Slack channel. I'm grateful to be in community with him and for his generosity as a teacher of us all. He encourages us to connect with our students and consider how our fear keeps us back from innovating in our teaching.

The number one difficulty for faculty in innovating in their practice is … fear.”  – Ken Bauer

Episode #098 – The Skillful Teacher with Stephen Brookfield

Like many of the other guests who have been on the show more than once, Stephen Brookfield's episodes continue to be popular among listeners. I was excited to read Stephen's revised edition of The Skillful Teacher: On Technique, Trust, and Responsiveness in the Classroom this past year. It is now among my top recommendations for new and experienced faculty, alike.

Stephen is transparent in his writing and his interviews as he shares about his own struggles with imposter syndrome and working toward talking less. He also reminds us to continually take risks in our teaching and recognize that there's no magic formula for teaching effectiveness.

Skillful teaching is whatever helps students learn.”  – Stephen Brookfield

Episode #088 – Top Five Gadgets for Teaching with Bonni & Dave Stachowiak

Lest we think that our community is above the click-bait nature of numbered posts and podcasts, this episode about the top five gadgets for teaching has continued to top the charts, since it was first released. Dave and I enjoyed talking about the gadgets we get the most value from in our teaching.

There was a complaint in the comments section that the episode was too Apple-centric, given that three of the five recommendations were specific to that ecosystem. However, given the number of downloads, at least we know there is an interest in this kind of information. We'll continue to work at being considerate of all computer / smartphone / device users in future episodes, while still recognizing that Apple has a commanding market share in some of these spaces.

Episode #112 – Radical Hope – A Teaching Manifesto with Kevin Gannon

As I mentioned at the top of this post, this list is not in any particular order. However, this episode is turning out to regularly being among the top three episodes, depending on the time I look. This is likely since so many of us in this community need the hope that what we are working toward makes a difference.

Kevin reminds us of the vulnerability required to teach effectively:

If I want my students to take risks and not be afraid to fail, then I need to take risks and not be afraid to fail.”  – Kevin Gannon

Contribute to the Upcoming 2017 Episodes

Your ideas about show topics and guests are always welcome. As I looked back at the list of the top ten, I found it somewhat concerning that 80% of the episodes that have been downloaded the most were with male guests. I did a quick count and found that 59 episodes of the podcast have been with male guests, while 53 of them have been with women. I didn't count the episodes when it was both Dave and I together. Also, I counted each episode guest's gender, meaning that people (including solo episodes with me) who have been on multiple times were tallied more than once.

My head hurts from speculating about why more downloads occurred with male guests… Perhaps it is as simple an explanation as that more than half of the guests represented on this list have been on the show multiple times?

I welcome any ideas you have about amplifying some of the more diverse voices of former guests. I started this particular post, thinking that I would link to the top ten and also list some that I think are not listened to as frequently, but are worth hearing. However, now that I'm at a much longer post than I thought this would be, I think I'll hold off on that idea for future blog posts.

Thanks to all of you for listening to the podcasts and giving potential guests even more of a reason to accept the invitations to be on the show.

Filed Under: Personal knowledge mastery

My Updated Personal Knowledge Management System

By Bonni Stachowiak | December 14, 2016 | | XFacebookLinkedInEmail

This Saturday, I begin a doctoral class that I teach a couple of times each year. One of the topics we explore is personal knowledge management (PKM).

Over the eight weeks we'll learn together, the doctoral students will create and refine their own PKM processes. They will then be able to regularly seek out new knowledge, make sense of that knowledge, and then share their own perspectives on it in community.

As I prepare for the course to start, I realize that some of my own PKM system has changed, since I first started teaching the course back in 2014. This post provides a current description of my approach and tools and hopefully gives anyone reading this post some inspiration for getting started with your own PKM system.

Personal Knowledge Management Defined

Instead of being at the mercy of all the information that flies at us on a given day, we can take charge of the process, and discover ways to seek our credible and relevant information, transform it into knowledge (information that serves a purpose), and share it with others in our networked communities. Harold Jarche defines PKM as:

… a set of processes, individually constructed, to help each of us make sense of our world and work more effectively.”

This graphic illustrates the tools that work in concert to make my PKM system efficient and effective.

pkm_tools-lg

Seek

Kris Shaffer emphasizes the need to combat misinformation in Truthy Lies and Surreal Truths: A Plea for Critical Digital Literacies. Where we go looking for information will certainly impact whether what we find is trustworthy and also if it is connected with our individual learning pursuits.

I try to keep the tools I use for seeking to a bare minimum (primarily Twitter, Feedly, and my podcast client – Overcast). I also regularly consider whether the people and sources I follow are worthy of my attention. To avoid being a information hoarder, I design a system that feeds me regularly and keeps me in a continual state of learning.

Twitter (Microblogging service)

Twitter is the most timely of my seek tools. My list for getting started on twitter for education doctoral students provides a small list of possibilities. Generally speaking, I advise following more individuals than you do organizations (there are exceptions to that guidance). Twitter is about relationship, for me. Peter Newbury also gave my Teaching in Higher Ed podcast listeners such good advice when he advocated that we follow people who are like us, and follow people who are not like us on Twitter.

Feedly (RSS reader)

Feedly connects me with articles, blogs, and other information from all sorts of areas of interest. Whether Seth Godin is filling my mind with wisdom, or I'm finding out about the latest geeky Apple news from Daring Fireball, I can be assured that valuable information is at the ready, each time I visit.

There's an option to mark-all-as-read on Feedly, too, which I can't recommend highly enough. Being able to press the reset buttons on our PKM systems is a vital option to keep in mind. We'll never be able to “keep up” with everything that is going on in our various social networks, but we can “tap in” when we're ready to engage.

Overcast (Podcast app)

Probably the easiest component for me to get behind in with my PKM system is with podcasting. There are so many phenomenal podcasts out there and not enough hours in the day to enjoy each of them. Malcolm Gladwell is doing some innovative storytelling with his Revisionist History podcast. Mike Wesch gives a tremendous look into college students' lives in the first episode of his Life101 podcast. This American Life tells stories about what happens when school kids from two very different contexts come together.

Sense

When people are first introduced to PKM, they usually get super energized and excited by the seek part. It's like getting to eat at a magnificent information buffet, with so many options to choose from… It's the sense part that is harder to digest.

Information in isolation does us no good. We must, instead, make sense of what we are taking in…

Social Bookmarking

We can use social bookmarking tools to keep our information categorized (through tagging) and make it easier to draw from it in the future.

I use a bookmarking service called Pinboard.in. As I view my tags, I can see which ones have the most bookmarks within them, because they show up as larger in my tag cloud. My three most popular tags are:

  • EDD703 (relevant information for the class I've been referring to in this post)
  • EdTech (lots of duplicates from EDD703 and EdTech, since they both address similar topics)
  • HigherEd (the industry I work in)

Share

This is the part of the process that often makes people the most nervous. There's a feeling of inadequacy that arises. What we share doesn't have to be an original creation. In fact, it is often through networked learning that we are able to discover places we might not have ventured on our own…

Curation

One way we can provide value to our networks is through curation. Curators are becoming increasingly popular in our knowledge-hungry society. This video talks about the benefits of curation and presents some popular curators from different disciplines.

We can also recognize the value of “working out loud.” As we document our failures, we're not the only ones who get to learn from those mistakes.

Original Content

I share original content weekly through releasing a podcast episode, a blog post, and tweeting out links to content I've created, as well as curated.

Scheduled Sharing

I use a service called Buffer that lets me tweet on whatever schedule best serves my network's needs, instead of whenever I happen to be in front of a computer.

Getting Started

While this post articulates my PKM system in its entirety, I suggest you don't try to follow it like it was a recipe. Instead, just dive in and start setting up a system to help you seek, sense, and share.

Find 4-5 people to follow on Twitter and start checking in on what they have to say daily. Set up a bookmarking service (EDD 703 students will be using Diigo, so we can share our bookmarks, together). And start retweeting some of the great things you read about on Twitter, with a few words of why you found what they had to say so important.

For more information on setting up a PKM, check out my Introduction to Personal Knowledge Management module.

 

Filed Under: Personal knowledge mastery

The invitation

By Bonni Stachowiak | December 1, 2016 | | XFacebookLinkedInEmail

The invitation

Yesterday, a colleague emailed me with a query:

We are so frustrated with the mis-use of electronics in class by students and feel they ultimately take away from learning and discussion. Texting, messaging, on line, etc. We have considered putting a ban on all electronics (laptops included) and see what happens.

Our occasional bans have certainly increased student involvement in class! On-line we find articles regarding such a ban, but wondered if you have any helpful information for us.

So can you speak to the other side of this coin?

PS – I so wish we were all where you are in regards to electronics in the classroom, but we are not…

Her message coincided with me not knowing what to blog about this week. A match made in blogger heaven…

The Dynamite Device Debate

Distractions abound in our classrooms and in our lives. The device debate has been raging for as long as I've been teaching. Often times, the debate produces a false dichotomy: Should we “allow” laptops/phones/etc., or should we “ban” them?

The “yes” side says we should ban laptops/phones because:

  • Using one's smart phone too often could result in decreased academic performance
  • Taking notes by hand will prove to be more effective for their learning
  • Avoiding their use helps us focus better (though, as this study explores, it's far more complex than that)

The “no” side says we should avoid banning laptops/phones because:

  • It takes away the option our students are most familiar with (they grew up taking notes this way)
  • We may inadvertently discriminate against students with learning and cognitive disabilities
  • “…unilateral bans on technology in the classroom accomplish nothing but demonstrating an off-putting rigidity and an adversarial view of students“

Then, there are some who advocate for giving students the choice of whether or not to use devices. Some faculty create a laptop-friendly zone where students can choose to sit, if they prefer to use a device. It can be vital to explain these choices to our students, to properly equip them to make decisions about how they will engage in the classroom. There's also the option to cooperate with the inevitable and allow for tech breaks during an otherwise gadget-free class.

The Invitation

If you visited one of my classes, what you would observe (in terms of device usage) would vary greatly. On some days, the students wouldn't use any technology at all. In fact, I wouldn't use any, either, preferring to teach with sticky notes or engage in a more serendipitous dialog than linear slide structures provide.

Jose Bowen advocates that we “teach naked” – as in not use technology while in a classroom environment. He stresses that we consider what we are doing in our pedagogy and whether or not laptops and other technology tools serve our purposes. When he was a guest on Teaching in Higher Ed, he said:

Nobody uses a laptop while doing yoga or playing tennis. – Jose Bowen

After learning from Jose's model, I started to frame my requests to put the tech away in more of a need-based argument. That might sounds something like:

We aren't going to be needing laptops or phones today, so you can put them away and get ready for today's case.

However, on other days, I make use of retrieval practice tools and invite students to take their devices out.

Today, we're going to review about the four types of competition in a capitalistic economic system. I invite you to take out your phones as we use PollEverywhere. If you don't have a phone or other device with you, let me know and you're free to borrow mine.

I continue to be challenged and encouraged by people who have questioned outright laptop bans like James Lang and Kevin Gannon. I'm finding that the whole idea of banning really sets the wrong tone for my teaching aspirations. I don't want to treat my students as adversaries. I want to engage them with the possibilities that learning offers.

However, I also recognize that our students have established norms in many of the educational experiences they have had before meeting me that engagement is not welcomed. Many of them have only known learning as a passive experience. For that kind of pedagogy, give your students the choice of how to take in what you have to say.

If you are committed to a different type of teaching style than lecture, invite your students to experience deeper learning through the power of dialog. Instead of imposing restrictions about what they can't use, invite them to have an experience that can't be had through the use of technology.

One of my professors in my doctoral classes would allow us to use our laptops during about half of the course time, but had a dedicated time where we invited to rearrange our chairs into a circle and put all our gadgets away. Each of us would share our reflections on that week's reading.

I remember grumbling (to myself) a bit about the “hassle” of moving furniture. I now recognize the symbolism that the actions represented. After a couple of weeks, he no longer had to instruct us on what to do, we had adopted new norms for having a deeper dialog than we typically had when our noses were behind our laptops.

Don't ban; invite.

Be sure that the first time you extend an invitation to put the technology away that you have something planned that will demonstrate something different is happening. Surprise them. Engage them. Get them up and moving around.

Build their trust that when they accept your invitation to put the potentially distracting devices away, that you'll be welcoming them in to a learning experience worthy of the sacrifice.

Filed Under: Educational Technology

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 62
  • Go to Next Page »

TOOLS

  • Blog
  • Podcast
  • Community
  • Weekly Update

RESOURCES

  • Recommendations
  • EdTech Essentials Guide
  • The Productive Online Professor
  • How to Listen to Podcasts

Subscribe to Podcast

Apple PodcastsSpotifyAndroidby EmailRSSMore Subscribe Options

ABOUT

  • Bonni Stachowiak
  • Speaking + Workshops
  • Podcast FAQs
  • Media Kit
  • Lilly Conferences Partnership

CONTACT

  • Get in Touch
  • Support the Podcast
  • Sponsorship
  • Privacy Policy

CONNECT

  • LinkedIn
  • Instagram
  • RSS

CC BY-NC-SA 4.0 Teaching in Higher Ed | Designed by Anchored Design