There’s something wrong with the way we’re grading that isn’t being talked about nearly enough.
On today’s show, Dr. Linda Nilson shares about a whole new way of thinking about assessing students’ work and making grades mean more.
Podcast Notes
Director of the Office of Teaching Effectiveness and Innovation at Clemson University
- Teaching at Its Best: A Research-Based Resource for College Instructors
- The Graphic Syllabus and the Outcomes Map: Communicating Your Course
- Creating Self-Regulated Learners: Strategies to Strengthen Students’ Self-Awareness and Learning Skills
- Specifications Grading: Restoring rigor, motivating students, and saving faculty time
Specifications grading
Advocating a new way of grading from University of Pittsburgh University Times
The problem with “traditional” grading
Academic and Occupational Performance: A Quantitative Synthesis (Samson, Graue, Weinstein & Walberg)
.155 correlation meta analysis done by Sampson
2.4% of the variance in career success
2006 study by the American Institutes for Research
Fewer than 1/2 of four year college graduates
Fewer than 3/4 of two year college graduates
Demonstrate literary proficiency
Explanation of specifications grading
Bundles
Virtual tokens
Robert Talbert blog
Casting out nines
How specifications grading came to be
Benefits
Concerns
Recommendations
Bonni: PollEverywhere (new features)
Linda: Cultivate your courage by trying out things you’re afraid of…